NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Estate Hawkins; Huxtable v Hawkins [2018] NSWSC 174 Hearing dates: 26, 27 and 28 June 2017 Date of orders: 23 February 2018 Decision date: 23 February 2018 Before: Lindsay J Decision: As de facto wife of the deceased (following a three year relationship with him), the plaintiff is to receive (as family provision relief under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 NSW) a legacy of $75,000 from the estate, or notional estate, of the deceased, whose principal beneficiaries are his three young adult children by an earlier relationship. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Family provision and maintenance – Eligibility – De facto spouse – Admitted relationship as a couple – Dispute as to whether "living together" – Peripatetic lifestyle of Deceased – Relationship of three years' standing – Competing claims of Deceased's children from earlier marriage – Relief granted. Legislation Cited: Interpretation Act 1987 NSW Succession Act 2006 NSW Cases Cited: Amprimo v Wynn [2015] NSWCA 286 Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [1938]' AC 463 Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490 Hills v Chalk [2008] QCA 159; [2009] 1 QD R 409 In re Allen [1922] NZLR 218 Petersen v Gregory [2007] NSWSC 8 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 17 CLR 9 Sadiq v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 716 Smoje v Forrester [2017] NSWCA 308 Thompson v Public Trustee of NSW [2010] NSWSC 1137 Vaughan v Hoskovich [2010] NSWSC 706 Texts Cited: - Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Victoria Barbara Huxtable Defendant: Harry Zac Hawkins Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: S Chapple Defendant: V Bedrossian and D Turner
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate