NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Atlantic Caravans Pty Ltd v Armstrong & Hinterland Outdoors Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 52 Hearing dates: 14 November 2017 Date of orders: 27 February 2018 Decision date: 27 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: S Westgarth, Deputy President D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed Catchwords: Jurisdiction – diversity jurisdiction of the Commonwealth – major defect, major failure under the Australian Consumer Law Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 NSW Corporations Act 2001 Judiciary Act 1903 Cases Cited: Australasian Temperance and General Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd. v. Howe (1922) 31 CLR 290 British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Western Australia (2003) 217 CLR 30 Burns v Corbett; Gaynor v Burns [2017] NSWCA 3; (2017) 343 ALR 690 Bywaters Investment Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] HCA 45 R v Trade Practices Tribunal; Ex parte Tasmanian Breweries Pty Ltd (1970) 123 CLR 361 Johnson v Dibbin; Gatsby v Gatsby [2018] NSWCATAP 45 Texts Cited: Ford, Austin & Ramsay, Principles of Corporations Law Leeming, Authority to Decide: The Law of Jurisdiction in Australia, 2012 Federation Press Category: Principal judgment Parties: Atlantic Caravans Pty Ltd (Appellant) Ronald Armstrong (Respondent) Hinterland Outdoors Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Doyle (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate