NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kerwin v R [2018] NSWCCA 23 Hearing dates: 9 February 2018 Date of orders: 26 February 2018 Decision date: 26 February 2018 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Hoeben CJ at CL at [2] Garling J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal upheld. (3) Quash the sentence imposed by Charteris A‑DCJ on 14 December 2016. (4) In lieu thereof, impose a sentence on the applicant of 2 years and 6 months non-parole commencing from 19 January 2016 with a balance of term of 2 years, expiring on 18 July 2020. (5) Note that the applicant will not be eligible for parole prior to the expiration of his non-parole period on 18 July 2018. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against sentence – break and enter into dwelling in company - whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of moral culpability – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to make a finding as to effect of mental condition on weight given to general deterrence – appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; (2013) 249 CLR 71 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37; (2014) 252 CLR 601 Laspina v R [2016] NSWCCA 181 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Christopher Kerwin (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Bouveng (Applicant) B Baker (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate