NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lahoud v Lahoud (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 179 Hearing dates: 22 February 2018 Decision date: 22 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: • Each party apart from the sixth defendant to bear his or its own costs of both the summons and the cross-summons; no order as to the costs of today's argument Catchwords: COSTS – where a party refused a Calderbank offer and then failed to achieve a better result – no presumption in favour of indemnity costs – offer inviting capitulation with no real element of compromise – where parties engaged in interminable disputes as to costs with no regard to proportionality Cases Cited: Jones v Bradley (No 2) 2003 NSWCA 258 Lahoud v Lahoud [2018] NSWSC 5 SMEC Testing Services Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWCA 323 Category: Costs Parties: Victor Lahoud (first plaintiff) Castle Constructions Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) Solidare Pty Ltd (third plaintiff) Joseph Lahoud (first defendant) Joseph Lahoud & Associates Pty Ltd (second defendant) Michael William Robinson (third defendant) John Bartos (fourth defendant) The Manager, Costs Assessment (fifth defendant) Attorney General (sixth defendant) Representation: Counsel: SJ Philips (plaintiffs) R Tassell (first and second defendants)
Solicitors: MT Partners (plaintiffs) Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (first and second defendants) Crown Solicitor's Office (NSW) (fifth and sixth defendants) File Number(s): 2015/361946 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate