NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sattar v Boral Constructions Materials Group Limited [2018] NSWSC 196 Hearing dates: 15 February 2018 Date of orders: 28 February 2018 Decision date: 28 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison AsJ Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The amended summons filed 9 October 2017 seeking to appeal the decision of his Honour Curran LCM dated 11 August 2018 is dismissed.
(2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings on an ordinary basis. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – whether the plaintiff's amended summons ought to be dismissed on grounds of incompetency – whether amended summons and proceedings ought to be dismissed pursuant to UCPR 13.4 – whether further opportunity to replead summons would allow for the identification of any arguable points of law or any points of mixed law and fact – leave to replead summons refused – amended summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: B & L Linings Pty Limited & Anor v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2008) 74 NSWLR 481; [2008] NSWCA 187 Sayed v Deng [2012] NSWSC 851 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council [2005] HCA 4; (2005) 220 CLR 517 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Qamar Jahan Sattar (Plaintiff) Boral Construction Materials Group Limited (First Defendant) Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Condon SC with L Fermanis (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate