R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 30) [2018] NSWSC 206

Supreme Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 30) [2018] NSWSC 206 Hearing dates: 22 February 2018 Date of orders: 22 February 2018 Decision date: 22 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [74] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Re-examination – Scope of re-examination – Whether evidence sought to be adduced by the Crown arose from cross-examination – Whether evidence relevant – Whether evidence should be excluded on the basis that its probative value was outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice – Evidence admitted Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hadid & Anor v Australis Media Ltd & Anor (No 14) (Supreme Court (NSW), Sperling J, 5 November 1996, unrep) IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 Papakosmas v R (1999) 196 CLR 297; [1999] HCA 37 R v Chambers (1848) 3 Cox CC 92 R v Lavery (No 2) (1979) 20 SASR 430 R v Yates [2002] NSWCCA 520 Schipp v Cameron & Ors (No 2) (Supreme Court (NSW), Einstein J, 8 October 1997, unrep) Wentworth v Rogers (No 10) (1987) 8 NSWLR 398 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 8) [2005] FCA 1348; (2005) 224 ALR 317 Texts Cited: Cross on Evidence - The Hon. J D Heydon QC Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ronald Edward Medich (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Harris and Ms G Wright (Crown) Mr W Terracini SC and Ms M Curry (Accused) Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Colin Daley Quinn (Accused) File Number(s): 2010/356916 Publication restriction: Nil