NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Clay v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 49 Hearing dates: 7 February 2018 Date of orders: 01 March 2018 Decision date: 01 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: 1. The decision under review is set aside.
2. In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made: The applicant is granted a Category AB firearms licence. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – merits review - firearms licence –– where applicant diagnosed with borderline personality disorder – where no ongoing treatment but symptom free period – whether risk of relapse – whether granting a licence contrary to the public interest - whether licence should be granted on conditions Legislation Cited: Firearms Act 1996 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: AML v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 5 Constantin v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16 Cusumano v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service [2001] NSWADT 50 Moroney v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2015] NSWCATAD 138 Ward v Commissioner of Police [2000] NSWADT 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel John Clay (Applicant) The NSW Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
Solicitors: Respondent: Maddocks File Number(s): 2017/00331574 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate