NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd v Zepinic; Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2018] NSWSC 246 Hearing dates: 11 August 2017 Decision date: 06 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The costs applicant is directed to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to these reasons for judgment and is invited to proceed as set out in par 36 Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — General rule that costs follow the event
COSTS — Party/Party — Bases of quantification — Indemnity basis— whether indemnity costs order should be made
COSTS — Party/Party — Bases of quantification — Gross sum costs order—whether costs order in specified gross sum should be made Legislation Cited: Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act (NSW) ss 98(4)(c), 101(4) Cases Cited: Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1254 Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited; Chateau Constructions (Aust) Limited v Zepinic [2017] NSWSC 582 Drummond & Rosen Pty Ltd v Easey (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 331 Grace v Grace (No 9) [2014] NSWSC 1239 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Category: Costs Parties: Chateau Constructions (Australia) Ltd (plaintiff) Milla Zepinic (first defendant) Vito Zepinic (second defendant)
Nina Zepinic (first plaintiff) Vito Zepinic (second plaintiff) Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate