NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Marvel Development Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 1112 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 February 2018 Date of orders: 06 March 2018 Decision date: 06 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Marvel Development Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr. Stan Kondilios, Hall and Wilcox (Applicant) Mr. Kendall Webber, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/266545 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. Leave is granted for the Applicant to rely on the amended plans and documents listed in paragraph 2 of the conditions of consent set out in Annexure "A" and included at Annexure "B". 2. The appeal is upheld. 3. The Applicant's clause 4.6 written request to vary the height limit is upheld. 4. Development Application DA0136/17, being for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a new boarding house with 25 rooms and a basement carpark at 375 Pacific Highway, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, is approved, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A" and the plans contained in Annexure "B". 5. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 8.15(3) (cf previous section 97B) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed, payable within 7 days of agreement or assessment. ………………………. Susan O'Neill Commissioner of the Court Annexure A (228 KB, pdf) Annexure B Pt1 (14.1 MB, PDF) Annexure B Pt2 (7.10 MB, PDF) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 06 March 2018
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate