NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Diaz v R [2018] NSWCCA 33 Hearing dates: 5 February 2018 Date of orders: 14 March 2018 Decision date: 14 March 2018 Before: Payne JA [1] Garling J [2] Hidden AJ [8] Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – aggravated kidnapping – sexual intercourse without consent – related matters on Form 1 – domestic violence – record of similar offences - challenge to sentencing judge's assessment of objective gravity of aggravating kidnapping – whether sentences manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Alkanaan v R [2017] NSWCCA 56 Diaz v R [2013] NSWCCA 277 Dinsdale v R (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hurst v R [2017] NSWCCA 114 Ibbs v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 447 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Edigarov [2001] NSWCCA 436; (2001) 125 A Crim R 551 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA 302; 164 A Crim R 179 R v Hibberd [200] NSWCCA 20; (2009) 194 A Crim R 1 R v Newell [2004] NSWCCA 183 R v Speechley [2012] NSWCCA 130; (2012) 221 A Crim R 175 Veen v The Queen [No. 2] (1987-88) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Respondent) Rodrigo Phillip Diaz (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: E Balodis (Crown) Ms S Kluss (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate