NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Tootle v R [2017] NSWCCA 328 Hearing dates: 26 October 2017 Decision date: 26 October 2017 Before: Latham J Beech-Jones J Wilson J Decision: Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – s 5F Appeal – abuse of process – principle of finality – fourth trial – refusal to grant permanent stay Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Calleija v Regina [2012] NSWCCA 37; 223 A Crim R 391 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jago v District Court of NSW [1989] HCA 46; 168 CLR 23 Keyowski v The Queen 40 CCC (3d) 481 at 483 King v R [2015] NSWCCA 99 Lindsay v The Queen [2015] HCA 16; 255 CLR 272; 243 A Crim R 429 R v Francisco and Dorain CCA 24 August 1995 (unreported) R v King [2003] NSWCCA 399; 59 NSWLR 472 R v Petroulias [2005] NSWCCA 75; 62 NSWLR 663 Tootle v R [2017] NSWCCA 103 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Tootle (Applicant) Regina (Crown/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N Angelov (Applicant) Mr E Balodis (Crown/Respondent)
Solicitors: Frontier Law Group (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions NSW (Crown/Respondent) File Number(s): 2012/00372707 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Date of Decision: 12 October 2017 Before: Bennett SC DCJ File Number(s): 2012/372707
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate