NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Otium Capital DT Pty Ltd trading as Otium Capital Discretionary Trust v City of Canada Bay Council [2018] NSWLEC 1115 Hearing dates: 13, 14 February 2018 Date of orders: 09 March 2018 Decision date: 09 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The orders of the Court are: 1) The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans; 2) No order as to costs; 3) The appeal is dismissed; 4) Development application DA 2016/0513 for alterations and additions to an existing two storey heritage building, construction of a rear addition and tree removal to facilitate the use of the subject site as a childcare centre for 80 children at 380 Great North Road, Abbotsford is refused. 5) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1, A, B, D and E. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL: Alterations and additions to an existing heritage building for reuse as a childcare centre – impact on the significance of the item – traffic and parking – whether the proposed boundary setback is appropriate – public submissions – refusal upheld. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589 Trinvass Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 151 Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 153; [2009] NSWLEC 153, Davies v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1141 Ausling v Willoughby City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1226 Assad v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1362 Texts Cited: Canada Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013 National Construction Code 2016 RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, October 2002 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Otium Captial DT Pty Ltd trading as Otium Capital Discretionary Fund (Applicant) City of Canada Bay Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr Chris Gough, Storey & Gough Lawyers (Applicant) Mr Peter Jackson, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00211635 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate