NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Shortland [2018] NSWCCA 34 Hearing dates: 1 February 2018 Decision date: 09 March 2018 Before: Basten JA at [1]; R A Hulme J at [37]; Hidden AJ at [46] Decision: (1) Allow the appeal and set aside the sentences imposed in the District Court.
(2) Sentence the offender, on each count, to imprisonment for 2 years, comprising a non-parole period of 15 months and a balance of term of 9 months, each sentence having commenced on 20 October 2017.
(3) The non-parole period will expire on 19 January 2019, whereupon the respondent will become entitled to release pursuant to a statutory parole order.
(4) The respondent is to be taken into custody forthwith. Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – prosecution appeal against manifest inadequacy – conviction following trial of three counts of sexual intercourse without consent under Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61I – sentences of 2 years' imprisonment on each count – sentences fully concurrent – sentences suspended – residual discretion to intervene
CRIME – sentencing – use of precedent – identifying pool of comparable cases – leniency absent evidence of remorse – assessing objective seriousness of penetrative sexual offending – exceptional hardship to family – relevance of delay in determining proceedings Legislation Cited: Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 158 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 68A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 12, 21A, 44, 54A, 54B, 54C; Pt 4, Div 1A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61H, 61HA, 61I, 61J Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), ss 5D, 21A Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 306I Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 501, 501CA Cases Cited: Bravo v R [2015] NSWCCA 302 Butler v R [2012] NSWCCA 23 Cahyadi R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Cheung v The Queen (2001) 209 CLR 1, [2001] HCA 67 Church v R [2012] NSWCCA 149 CMB v Attorney General for New South Wales (2015) 256 CLR 346; [2015] HCA 9 Cowling v R [2015] NSWCCA 213 Day v R [2017] NSWCCA 192 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321, [2000] HCA 54 Dipangkear v R [2010] NSWCCA 156 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Pratten (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 42 Elmir v R [2009] NSWCCA 22 Elshani v R [2015] NSWCCA 254 Ewen v R [2015] NSWCCA 117; (2015) 250 A Crim R 544 Faehringer v R [2017] NSWCCA 248 Flick v R [2012] NSWCCA 170 FP v R [2012] NSWCCA 182 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Greenwood v R [2014] NSWCCA 64 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293; [1977] HCA 44 Hopley v R [2008] NSWCCA 105 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Ihemeje v R [2012] NSWCCA 269 King v R [2010] NSWCCA 202 McCartney v R [2009] NSWCCA 244 Mills v R [2017] NSWCCA 87 Mulato v R (2006) NSWCCA 282 Nguyen v The Queen (2016) 256 CLR 656; [2016] HCA 17 Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284 R v AA [2017] NSWCCA 84 R v Alcazar [2017] NSWCCA 51 R v CTG [2017] NSWCCA 163 R v Daley [2010] NSWCCA 223 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Hull [2016] NSWSC 634 R v Isaacs (1997) 41 NSWLR 374 R v JW (2010) 77 NSWLR 7; [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Kertebani [2010] NSWCCA 221 R v Macdonald; R v Maitland [2017] NSWSC 638 R v Reeves [2014] NSWCCA 154 R v Sharma [2017] NSWCCA 85 R v Shrestha (1991) 173 CLR 48 R v Tuhakaraina [2016] NSWCCA 81 R v Van Ryn [2016] NSWCCA 1 R v Wirth (1976) 14 SASR 291 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222 Sabapathy v R [2008] NSWCCA 82 Saddler v R [2009] NSWCCA 83; (2009) 194 A Crim R 452 Waugh (aka Willougby) v R [2010] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) Joseph Raniera Shortland (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Dowling SC (Appellant) D Barrow (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate