NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 12) [2018] NSWSC 283 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 08 March 2018 Decision date: 08 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Leave to Mr Sayed to subpoena Robert Gizzi and Ivo Olbrecht is refused. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – subpoenas – application by litigant in person to issue subpoenas to person to attend to give evidence – late application – proposed evidence outside pleadings and issues – directions that evidence be completed by December 2016 – matter fixed in July 2017 for hearing in April 2018 – proposed evidence related to claims for which leave earlier refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 6) [2016] NSWSC 1253 National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 8) [2017] NSWSC 89 National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 9) [2017] NSWSC 389 National Australia Bank v Sayed (No. 10) [2018] NSWSC 108 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: National Australia Bank Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Bilal Sayed (Cross-Claimant) Representation: Counsel: G Lucarelli (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) In person (Cross-Claimant)
Solicitors: DibbsBarker (Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Self-represented (Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 2010/135614 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate