NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 53 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 09 March 2018 Decision date: 09 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: R C Titterton, Principal Member Decision: (1) The applicant is to pay 75% of the respondent's costs as agreed or as assessed. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application pursuant to Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 and application pursuant to Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 - costs - special circumstances Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Cases Cited: Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 51 Brodyn Pty Ltd v Owners Corporation – Strata Plan 73019 (No 2)[2016] NSWCATAP 224 CEU v Ombudsman [2017] NSWCATAD 267 CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCATAD 323 CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCATAD 79 CEU v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 13 Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2017] NSWCATAD 198 Choi v University of Technology Sydney [2018] NSWCATAD 7 eMove Pty Ltd v Naomi Dickinson [2015] NSWCATAP 94 Flat Glass Industries Ltd v MCS Builders Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATAP 148 Category: Costs Parties: CEU (Applicant) University of Technology Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Self-represented (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate