NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: DEO v Children's Guardian [2018] NSWCATAD 54 Hearing dates: 4 December 2017 Date of orders: 09 March 2018 Decision date: 09 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Grant, Senior Member S Davison, General Member Decision: The applicant's application for an enabling order is dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – child protection – working with children check clearance – applicant a disqualified person by reason of a conviction for an indecent assault – whether applicant has discharged the onus of proof – onus of proof not discharged Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Prohibitive Employment) Act 1998 (Repealed) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: BHA v Children's Guardian [2014] NWCATAD 161 BHA v Children's Guardian [2014] NWCATAD 161 BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 CHB v Children's Guardian (2016) NSWCATAD 214 CMA v Children's Guardian (2016) NSWCATAD 264 Commission for Children and Young People v FZ (2011) NSWCA 111 Commission for Children and Young People v Y [2002] NSWCA 949 Director of Public Prosecution v Smith (1991) VR 6 Smith v Commissioner Police 2014 NSWCATAD 184. Category: Principal judgment Parties: DEO (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant (self-represented) Ms McDonald (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate