NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Crest No1 Pty Limited v Liverpool City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1122 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 December 2017; 30 January 2018; 6, 16 & 28 February 2018 and 9 March 2018 Date of orders: 09 March 2018 Decision date: 09 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Liverpool Local Environmental Plan 2008 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crest No1 Pty Limited (Applicant) Liverpool City Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitor: Anthony Boskovitz, Boskovitz & Associates Solicitors (Applicant) Elizabeth Espinosa, Liverpool City Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/242419 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the actual refusal by Liverpool City Council of development application DA-989/2016. The application sought consent for Lot consolidation and construction of a 10 storey residential flat building containing 26 residential apartments over two levels of basement for 20 vehicles. The works are proposed at 48 Speed Street, Liverpool. 2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 3. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 5. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. The Applicant is given leave to rely on the following plans: 1. Architectural Plans Description Drawing No. Date Prepared by Cover page 01 Jan 18 Baini Design Compliance Table 02 Jan 18 Baini Design Basements 1 - 2 03 Jan 18 Baini Design Site Plan / Ground Floor 04 Jan 18 Baini Design Levels 1-3 05 Jan 18 Baini Design Levels 4 & 5 06 Jan 18 Baini Design Level 6 07 Jan 18 Baini Design Elevations 1 10 09/02/18 Baini Design Elevations 2 11 09/02/18 Baini Design Elevations 3 12 09/02/18 Baini Design 3D views 1 13 09/02/18 Baini Design 3D views 2 14 09/02/18 Baini Design 3D views 3 15 09/02/18 Baini Design Perspective 2 16 09/02/18 Baini Design Roof Plan 17 09/02/18 Baini Design
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate