NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Geoffrey John Lomman v Windbelt Pty Limited [2018] NSWLEC 29 Hearing dates: 15, 16 and 17 August 2017 Date of orders: 13 March 2018 Decision date: 13 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [105] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – where development consent only permissible for temporary purpose pursuant to cl 2.8 of LEP – whether Council reached requisite state of satisfaction that use would not adversely affect adjoining land or amenity of neighbourhood – whether Council had sufficient evidence to reach state of satisfaction – whether state of satisfaction a jurisdictional fact – onus of proof in judicial review proceedings – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Arnold v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (No 5) [2013] NSWLEC 42 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia (2005) 148 FCR 446; [2005] FCA 1707 Bankstown Municipal Council v Fripp (1919) 26 CLR 385; [1919] HCA 41 BP Australia Ltd v Campbelltown City Council (1994) 83 LGERA 274 Bungendore Residents Group Inc v Palerang Council (No 3) [2007] NSWLEC 251 Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Ltd & Anor [2010] NSWCA 353; (2010) 178 LGERA 411 Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Limited and Minister for Mineral Resources (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 1; (2010) 172 LGERA 25 Carstens v Pittwater Council [1999] NSWLEC 249; (1999) 111 LGERA 1 Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135; [2000] HCA 5 Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (1998) 100 LGERA 365 Danis Hotels Pty Ltd v Dubbo City Council (1991) 72 LGRA 35 Darley Australia Pty Ltd v Walfertan Processors Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 48; (2012) 188 LGERA 26 Dougherty Bros Pty Ltd v Outline Planning Consultants Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 72; (2016) 216 LGERA 144 Franklins Ltd v Penrith City Council [1999] NSWCA 134 Hortis v Manly Council [1999] NSWLEC 151; (1999) 104 LGERA 43 Hub Action Group Inc v Minister for Planning [2008] NSWLEC 116; (2008) 161 LGERA 136 Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council [2005] NSWCA 99; (2005) 138 LGERA 207 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council [2009] NSWCA 151 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332; [2013] HCA 18 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611; [1999] HCA 21 Minister for Resources and Energy v Gold and Copper Resources Pty Ltd (2015) 89 NSWLR 134; [2015] NSWCA 113 Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319 Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 Roden v Bandora Holdings Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 191; (2015) 213 LGERA 103 Rossi v Living Choice Australia Ltd [2015] NSWCA 244 Schroders Australia Property Management Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2001] NSWCA 74 Walsh v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 255; (2007) 161 LGERA 118 Wilson on behalf of Gurrungar Environment Group v Bourke Shire Council and Ors [2001] NSWLEC 28; (2001) 114 LGERA 35 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 51 NSWLR 589; [2001] NSWCA 167 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Geoffrey John Lomman (First Applicant) Susan Nicola Lomman (Second Applicant) Windbelt Pty Limited (First Respondent) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P McEwen SC (First and Second Applicants) P Tomasetti SC with A Hemmings (First Respondent) C J Legatt SC with J Smith (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate