NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barr (a pseudonym) v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2018] NSWCA 47 Hearing dates: 15 February 2018 Date of orders: 21 February 2018 Decision date: 15 March 2018 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; McCallum J at [88]; N Adams J at [124] Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — Bail — judicial review of bail decision — whether Court of Appeal has jurisdiction
JUDICIAL REVIEW — detention application under Bail Act 2013 (NSW) following guilty plea — alleged contravention of s 50(5) and s 74 of Bail Act — whether error of law on face of record — whether jurisdictional error — construction of s 16A of Bail Act
JURISDICTION — Court of Appeal — Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 17 and Third Schedule — whether exclusion of jurisdiction for criminal proceedings applies to challenges to bail decisions — discretionary refusal of jurisdiction in light of pending release application to Supreme Court Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 16, 16A, 16B, 17, 18, 19, 22A, 46, 49, 50, 66, 67, 71, 74, 75 Bail Regulation 2014 (NSW), r 17 Constitution (Cth), s 73 Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW), s 2 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 79, 81, 578A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 3A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 34, 35 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 17, 48, 69, 101, Third Schedule Cases Cited: Australian and International Pilots Association v Fair Work Australia (2012) 202 FCR 200; [2012] FCAFC 65 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Brooks [2015] NSWCCA 190 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mawad [2015] NSWCCA 227 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Tikomaimaleya [2015] NSWCA 83 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Zaiter [2016] NSWCCA 247 El-Zayet v R (2014) 88 NSWLR 556; [2014] NSWCCA 298 Federated Engine-Drivers and Firemen's Association of Australasia v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1911) 12 CLR 398; [1911] HCA 31 Graham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 33; 91 ALJR 890 Hamze v R [2015] NSWCCA 104 Jure Maric v The Queen [1981] 2 NSWLR 100 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531; [2010] HCA 1 Lin v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2017] NSWSC 312 Liristis v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 261 M v R [2015] NSWSC 138 McAndrew v Regina [2016] NSWCCA 58 M v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2016] NSWCCA 314 Obeid v R (2015) 91 NSWLR 226; [2015] NSWCCA 309 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369; [1938] HCA 7 Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd [2018] HCA 4 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (2012) 247 CLR 240; [2012] HCA 33 Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2015] NSWCA 63 R v Ebrahimi [2015] NSWSC 335 R v Marcus [2016] NSWCCA 237 R v Nanai [2000] NSWCCA 204 R v S [2016] NSWCCA 189 R v Serratore (1995) 81 A Crim R 363 Shepherd v Bowen (1986) 4 NSWLR 475 South 32 t/as Westcliff Colliery v Ockers [2017] NSWCA 324 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWSC 1254 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 Tsintzas v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2017] NSWCCA 172 W O v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2009] NSWCA 370 Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 129; [2017] HCA 54 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278; [1986] HCA 88 Texts Cited: M Aronson, M Groves and G Weeks, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed, 2017, Lawbook Co) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Barr (a pseudonym) (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (First Respondent) District Court of New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: L J Rowan (Applicant) C Webster SC (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate