NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Watiwat v Dixon [2018] NSWCA 48 Hearing dates: 14 March 2018 Decision date: 14 March 2018 Before: Basten JA and Simpson JA Decision: (1) Dismiss the summons filed 19 December 2017 seeking leave to appeal from the judgment of Robb J given on 20 September 2017.
(2) Order that the applicant pay the respondents' costs of the summons, assessed on the basis of their joint representation. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal – proposed appeal from decision regarding practice or procedure – where leave sought to appeal from dismissal of proceedings under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.3 – whether issue of principle, question of general public importance, or more than merely arguable error raised – whether leave should be granted Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 13.4 Cases Cited: Be Financial Pty Ltd atf Be Financial Operations Trust v Das [2012] NSWCA 164 In Re the Will of FB Gilbert (Dec'd) (1946) 46 SR(NSW) 318 Watiwat v Dixon [2017] NSWSC 360 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Bienvenido Watiwat (Applicant) Stephen Robert Dixon (First Respondent) Winnie Leung (Second Respondent) Carlos Vincenzo (Third Respondent) Lion Financial Pty Ltd (Fourth Respondent) Representation: Counsel: No appearance by Applicant R Parsons (Respondents)
Solicitors: Applicant self-represented CLH Lawyers (Respondents) File Number(s): 2017/313745 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2017] NSWSC 1242 Date of Decision: 20 September 2017 Before: Robb J File Number(s): 2016/310747
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate