NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Ronald Edward Medich (No. 38) [2018] NSWSC 322 Hearing dates: 1 March 2018 Date of orders: 14 March 2018 Decision date: 14 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: See [54] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and Procedure – Witnesses – Where Crown declined to call witness or make him available for cross-examination on the grounds of unreliability – Whether Court should order witness to be called – Power of the Court to do so – Whether temporary stay of proceedings should be granted – Whether to call the witness Cases Cited: Diehm v DPP (Nauru) [2013] HCA 42; 303 ALR 42 Lane v R [2013] NSWCCA 317; 241 A Crim R 321 MacDonald v R; Maitland v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 736; [2016] NSWCCA 306 R v Apostilides (1984) 154 CLR 563; [1984] HCA 38 R v Kneebone (1999) 47 NSWLR 450; [1999] NSWCCA 279 R v O'Brien [1996] SASC 6172; 66 SASR 396 R v Seller; R v McCarthy (2015) 89 NSWLR 155; [2015] NSWCCA 76 Richardson v R (1974) 131 CLR 116; [1974] HCA 19 Whitehorn v R (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Ronald Edward Medich (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms S Harris and Ms G Wright (Crown) Mr W Terracini SC and Ms M Curry (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) Colin Daley Quinn (Accused) File Number(s): 2010/356916 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate