NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bentley; R v Davies; R v Thomas; R v Tilley [2018] NSWSC 332 Hearing dates: 9 and 12 March 2018 Date of orders: 12 March 2018 Decision date: 12 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Jury directed in accordance with these reasons Catchwords: CRIME – joint criminal enterprise – extended joint criminal enterprise – self-defence – whether self-defence should be left to the jury in relation to accused who did not commit the act which caused death
CRIME – extended joint criminal enterprise – whether jury should be directed that the Crown must establish that each accused must be aware that an extendable baton was to taken to the premises – where cause of death unknown
CRIME – constructive murder – whether constructive murder should be left to the jury Cases Cited: Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316; [1998] HCA 75 IL v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 764; [2017] HCA 27 Hawi v R (2014) 244 A Crim R 159; [2014] NSWCCA 83 Clayton v The Queen (2006) 81 ALJR 439; [2006] HCA 58 R v Sharah (1992) 30 NSWLR 292 Taufahema v R [2007] NSWCCA 33 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Mitchell James Bentley (Accused) Jack Davies (Accused) William Patrick Thomas (Accused) Jamie Michael Tilley (Accused) Representation: Counsel: D Scully (Crown) J Trevallion (Accused Bentley) P D Young SC (Accused Davies) N Carroll (Accused Thomas) J Stratton SC (Accused Tilley)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate