NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Management Services Australia Pty Ltd v PM Works Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2018] NSWSC 336 Hearing dates: On the papers. Date of orders: 16 March 2018 Decision date: 16 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: McDougall J Decision: See at [61]. Catchwords: COSTS – general rule that costs follow the event – discussion of judicial discretion to otherwise order – discretion generally not to be exercised by reference to formal statement of issues in dispute – no reason to displace general principle
COSTS – defendants' offer of compromise – offer not accepted – where defendants better offer – where plaintiff has not demonstrated extra-ordinary circumstances displacing rule in UCPR 42.15A – indemnity costs awarded from date of offer of compromise
COSTS – defendants withdrew lengthy affidavits during course of hearing – where plaintiff incurred expenses in preparing and responding to those affidavits – defendants to pay plaintiff's associated costs
COSTS – application for third party costs order – whether principal should be made joint and severally liable for costs – where principal was person who directed litigation and stood to gain from it – insufficient reason for piercing corporate veil – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2001] HCA 26; (2001) 179 ALR 406 Caine v Lumley General Insurance Ltd (No. 2) [2008] NSWCA 109 Consolidated Lawyers Ltd v Abu-Mahmoud [2016] NSWCA 4 Management Service Australia Pty Ltd v PM Works Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1743 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368 Rushton (Qld) Pty Ltd v Rushton (NSW) Pty Ltd [2004] QSC 47 Walker v Harwood [2017] NSWCA 228 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Eq 3 Category: Costs Parties: Management Services Australia Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PM Works Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Amit Banerji (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Assaf / P Strickland (Plaintiff) M Cairns / L Hulmes (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate