NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Croker v Samsung Electronics Co Ltd [2018] NSWSC 345 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 March 2018 Decision date: 19 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Refuse leave to institute proceedings against Samsung Electronics Co Limited and Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Limited.
(2) Dismiss the Summons. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – parties – vexatious litigants – leave to institute proceedings – Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) – applicant sought leave to proceed with claim dismissed by NCAT – no need for oral hearing – affidavit did not comply with s 14(3)(a) and (c) – no prima facie ground for the proceedings - proceedings vexatious within meaning of s 6(b) – leave refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 146 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), sch 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 37AO(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.34 Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), ss 6, 8(7), 14-16 Cases Cited: Application by Bar-Mordecai [2013] NSWSC 1908 Attorney General of New South Wales v Croker [2010] NSWSC 942 Soden v Croker (No. 2) [2016] FCA 15; (2016) 334 ALR 540 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Clayton Robert Croker (Plaintiff) Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (First Defendant) Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: On the papers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate