NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited v Zipevski [2018] NSWDC 54 Hearing dates: 20-21 February 2018 Date of orders: 20 March 2018 Decision date: 20 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Dicker SC DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the first plaintiff against the defendant; (2) The claim of the second plaintiff in the Amended Statement of Claim is dismissed; (3) The parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Order within seven days reflecting these reasons including any claim for interest by the first plaintiff; (4) The defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed; (5) Liberty to the parties to apply within 14 days for a different costs order to that referred to in Order 4 above; (6) Exhibits to be returned after 28 days. Catchwords: Contract – action in debt - loans for the purposes of investments in agricultural schemes – transaction documents completed pursuant to power of attorney – effect of approval of settlement in class action proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria of a deed of settlement – whether accountant who introduced defendant to the investments was the agent of either plaintiff – whether Loan Deeds unjust under the Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW).
Conflict of laws – proper law of the contract – relevance to the Contracts Review Act 1980, section 17.
Assignment – assignment of rights under future deeds – whether there was a legal assignment. Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Property Law Act 1969 (WA) Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic) Cases Cited: Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418 Anning v Anning (1907) 4 CLR 1049 Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd v Pekell Delaire Holdings Pty Ltd (2017) 118 ACSR 592; [2017] VSCA 51 Bonython v Commonwealth (1950) 81 CLR 486 Calvo v Ellimark Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 136 Clark (as trustee of the Clarke Family Trust) v Great Southern Finance Pty Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liquidation) [2014] VSC 516 Crabtree Vickers Pty Ltd v Australian Direct Mail & Addressing Co Pty Ltd (1975) 133 CLR 72 Maha Pty Ltd v Coplin [2007] NSWCA 318 Provident Capital Ltd v Papa (2013) 84 NSWLR 231; [2013] NSWCA 36 Re Elsmore Resources Ltd [2016] NSWSC 856 Vita Food Products Inc v Unus Shipping Co Ltd [1939] AC 277 Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd v Crocker [2016] NSWCA 265 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited (First Plaintiff) ABL Nominees Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Michael Zipevski (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Koch (Plaintiff) M Zipevski (In Person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate