NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Toman v R [2018] NSWCCA 51 Hearing dates: 21 March 2018 Date of orders: 21 March 2018 Decision date: 21 March 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Johnson J at [2] Price J at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – break enter and steal – whether sentencing judge erred by rejecting unchallenged psychiatrists' opinions – diagnosis of schizophrenia - clear planning of offence – no error found Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 112(1)(a), 114(1)(c) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Yang v R [2012] NSWCCA 49; (2012) 219 A Crim R 550 Barbieri v R [2016] NSWCCA 295 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William John Toman (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham (Applicant) A Mitchelmore (Respondent)
Solicitors: R F Bergagnin & Co Solicitors (Applicant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/232095 Publication restriction: No Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 15 May 2017 Before: Colefax SC DCJ File Number(s): 2015/232095
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate