NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of S [2018] NSWSC 367 Hearing dates: 2 February 2018 (preliminary hearing) 8 March 2018 (substantive hearing) Decision date: 23 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity - Adoptions List Before: Black J Decision: Birth mother's and birth father's consent to the adoption dispensed with pursuant to s 67 of the Adoption Act 2000 (NSW). Order for the adoption of S in favour of K and G granted. The proposed name for S approved. Catchwords: FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE – adoption – where child has established a stable relationship with proposed adoptive parents – whether consent of birth parents should be dispensed with pursuant to s 67 of the Adoption Act 2000 (NSW).
FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE – adoption – where there is no realistic possibility of restoration of the child to birth parents' care – whether adoption order is in the child's best interests – whether adoption is preferable to other courses – whether an adoption order should be made. Legislation Cited: - Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) ss 7, 8, 43, 52, 54, 67, 90, 91, 101 - Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: - Adoption of KH [2015] NSWSC 274 - Adoption of NG (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 680 - Director General Dept of Human Services; Re M [2011] NSWSC 369 - Re Adoption of RCC and RZA [2015] NSWSC 813 - Re ASK and the Adoption Act 2000 [2017] NSWSC 521 - Re Infant, K and the Adoption of Children Act [1973] 1 NSWLR 311 - Re K and the Adoption Act 2000 [2005] NSWSC 858; Re DYK and the Adoption Act 2000 [2005] NSWSC 1045 - Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services; Re C and the Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) [2014] NSWSC 1007 - Secretary, New South Wales Dept of Family and Community Services (by his delegate Principal Officer, Adoptions, Barnardos Australia); Re JLR [2015] NSWSC 926 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Secretary, New South Wales Department of Family and Community Services (Plaintiff) M & T (Defendants) (appearing at preliminary hearing only) Representation: Counsel: M Neville (Plaintiff) H Ginges (Defendants) (prior to 8 March 2018)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate