NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chahal Group Pty Ltd v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 58 Hearing dates: 26 February 2018 Decision date: 27 March 2018 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Gleeson JA at [32]; Emmett AJA at [33] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: APPEALS – assessment of credibility by primary judge – whether primary judge erred in assessment of relative credibility of witnesses – whether primary judge gave weight to failure of the second respondent to explain motive of other witnesses – whether primary judge erred in failing to give sufficient weight to commercial motive of the appellant – whether primary judge erred in finding evidence of other witnesses was irrelevant Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.53 Cases Cited: Balenzuela v De Gail (1959) 101 CLR 226; [1959] HCA 1 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Hughes v The Crown (2015) 93 NSWLR 474 King v Collins [2007] NSWCA 122 Mastronardi v New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 54 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chahal Group Pty Ltd (ACN 149 138 278) (First Appellant) Shakir Ismail Chaudhry (Second Appellant) 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Birch SC (Appellants) I M Jackman SC with T W Marskell (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate