NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Issakidis [2018] NSWSC 378 Hearing dates: 11 December 2017 Date of orders: 29 March 2018 Decision date: 29 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) For committing count 1 on the indictment, being an offence contrary to s 135.4(5) of the Criminal Code, sentenced to imprisonment for 7 years commencing on 16 October 2017 and expiring on 15 October 2024. (2) For committing count 2 on the indictment, being an offence contrary to s 11.5(1) and s 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code, sentenced to imprisonment for 8 years and 3 months commencing on 16 October 2019 and expiring on 15 January 2028. (3) Pursuant to s 19AB(1) of the Crimes Act 1914, fix a single non-parole period of 7 years and 6 months expiring on 15 April 2025. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – conspiracy to dishonestly cause a loss or risk of loss to the Commonwealth – conspiracy to deal with property of a value of $1M or more believing it to be the proceeds of crime – where offender part of a conspiracy to make false depreciation claims in company tax returns – where loss to the Commonwealth exceeded $100M – where intended loss or risk of loss to the Commonwealth amounted to approximately $135M – where offender part of a conspiracy to launder the proceeds of crime through offshore accounts – where offences involved intricate planning and preparation and occurred over a number of years
CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – relevant factors on sentence – co-offenders – parity – where offences in the worst category – where offender motivated by greed – where strong need for deterrence – where offender has shown no contrition – where good prospects of rehabilitation – where significant delay – where hardship to offender and his wife – where offender has mental and physical health problems – where offender is of advanced age – where no relevant criminal history Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dickson v R [2016] NSWCCA 105 DPP (Cth) v Goldberg (2001) 184 ALR 387; [2001] VSCA 107 DPP (Cth) v Gregory (2011) 34 VR 1; [2011] VSCA 145 DPP (Cth) v Pratten (No 2) (2017) 94 NSWLR 194; [2017] NSWCCA 42 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 R v Anthony James Dickson (No 18) [2015] NSWSC 268 R v Caradonna (2000) 118 A Crim R 312; [2000] NSWCCA 398 R v Huang (2007) 174 A Crim R 370; [2007] NSWCCA 259 R v Huston; R v Fox; R v Henke; ex parte Cth DPP (2011) 219 A Crim R 209; [2011] QCA 350 R v Ly (2014) 241 A Crim R 192; [2014] NSWCCA 78 R v Milne (No 6) [2010] NSWSC 1467 R v Obeid (No 12) [2016] NSWSC 1815 R v Stitt (1998) 102 A Crim R 428 R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 R v Wright (1994) 74 A Crim R 152 Sabra v R [2015] NSWCCA 38 Shepherd v R (1988) 37 A Crim R 303 Thangavelautham v R [2016] NSWCCA 141 Tyler v R; R v Chalmers (2007) 173 A Crim R 458; [2007] NSWCCA 247 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Michael John Issakidis (Offender) Representation: Counsel: M G McHugh SC with A McGrath (Crown) M Smith (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate