NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alexandria Landfill Pty Ltd v Roads and Maritime Services; Boiling Pty Limited v Roads and Maritime Services (No 5) [2018] NSWLEC 37 Hearing dates: 20 and 21 March 2018 Decision date: 26 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Sheahan J Decision: Questions allowed Catchwords: EVIDENCE: Questions asked in cross-examination of the applicants' valuation experts challenged for alleged unfairness – questions allowed – reasons sought. Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Alexandria Landfill Pty Ltd (Applicant) Boiling Pty Ltd (Applicant) Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings, SC with Mr M Seymour, Ms K Lindeman, barristers (Applicants) Mr R Lancaster, SC with Mr N Eastman, and Mr M Astill, barristers (Respondent)
Solicitors: Addisons (Applicants) Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondents) File Number(s): 2016/155678 2016/155930
Judgment
Introduction 1. Senior Counsel for the applicants has asked me to provide reasons for my ruling that Senior Counsel for the respondent could cross-examine the respondent's valuation experts (Mr Dyson and Mr Samuel) on whether or not a lease entered between the applicants, and remaining in force as at the date of acquisition, could impact on their assessment of the market value of Lot 2. 2. The lease is before the Court (as Tender Bundle document 455).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate