NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hamzy v R [2018] NSWCCA 53 Hearing dates: 21 February 2018 Date of orders: 28 March 2018 Decision date: 28 March 2018 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Simpson JA at [181]; McCallum J at [200] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. (3) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (4) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction and sentence appeal – manslaughter and wounding with intent – self-defence – excessive force inflicting death – Crimes Act 1900, s 421 – whether open to jury to find conduct not a reasonable response in circumstances as perceived by the offender – whether victim was armed with a pistol – whether victim was about to shoot offender – whether jury's verdict consistent with finding that offender believed that conduct was necessary to defend himself – whether that response reasonably open to jury – conviction appeal dismissed – SENTENCE APPEAL – whether findings by a sentencing judge consistent with jury verdict – whether sentence manifestly unjust – limitations inherent in reliance upon other manslaughter cases – sentence appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 18, 24, 33(1)(a), 418, 419, 421 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) – s 132(5) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) – s 38 Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; 253 CLR 58 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; 249 CLR 571 CR v R [2017] NSWCCA 29 De Wet v R [2015] NSWCCA 23 Diab v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 58 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Grant v R [2014] NSWCCA 67 Hawi v R [2014] NSWCCA 83 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 Pitt v R [2014] NSWCCA 70 R v Hamzy [2016] NSWSC 1512 R v Hamzy (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1514 Regina v Diab [2007] NSWSC 577 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13; 243 CLR 400 Smith v R [2015] NSWCCA 193 Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mohammed Hamzy – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC/G Lewer – Applicant T Smith – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate