NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wakim v Wakim [2018] NSWCA 61 Hearing dates: 21 March 2018 Date of orders: 21 March 2018 Decision date: 21 March 2018 Before: Payne JA Decision: (1) Until the Court of Appeal delivers its judgment in the 2017/00372408 appeal or further order of the Court of Appeal, the respondent be restrained from doing any acts or taking any steps to evict the appellant from the premises at 28 Rosemont Street, Punchbowl, New South Wales.
(2) Costs of the motion to be costs in the cause. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for injunction – whether serious question to be tried – usual undertaking as to damages – balance of convenience – expedition – case management Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; [2001] HCA 63 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 Texts Cited: None Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Elias George Wakim (Applicant) Karime Wakim (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Hawkins (Applicant) C Robinson (Respondent)
Solicitors: Attia Lawyers (Applicant) Cambridge Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/00372408 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Civil Citation: [2017] NSWSC 1283 Date of Decision: 22 September 2017 Before: Sackar J File Number(s): 2015/229975
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate