NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dimitriou v Huybers (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 62 Hearing dates: 26 March 2018 Decision date: 26 March 2018 Before: Basten JA; Macfarlan JA; Leeming JA Decision: (1) The Court:
(a) refuses the application to tender an additional affidavit and accompanying exhibit. (b) dismisses the application to vacate the hearing.
Following further argument:
(2) The amended notice of motion filed 24 November 2017 is dismissed.
(3) Applicants to pay the costs of the respondents to be assessed on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to vacate hearing date – proposal to tender volume of documents not before primary judge – no opportunity to address the material – no evidence explaining why production so late
CIVIL PROCEDURE – dismissal of appeal for non-compliance with directions – application to review decision of single judge – inadequacy of explanation for non-compliance – judge not satisfied as to responsibility of lawyers for non-compliance – judge satisfied appeal had no realistic prospects of success Category: Principal judgment Parties: George Dimitriou (First Applicant) Wyse & Young International Pty Ltd (Second Applicant) Wyse Accounting Pty Ltd (Third Applicant) Susan Elizabeth Huybers (First Respondent) Pineview Property Holdings Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Salvatore Russo t/as Russo and Partners (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr G Dimitriou for all applicants Mr D Allen (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate