NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Knightsbridge North Lawyers Pty Limited v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2018] NSWSC 387 Hearing dates: 21 – 23 March 2018 Date of orders: 23 March 2018 Decision date: 23 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1. The summons filed on 21 March 2018 is dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) – decision to hold public inquiry – ICAC Act 1988 (NSW), s 31 – decision to investigate matters – ICAC Act 1988 (NSW), s 20 – no jurisdictional error – prerequisites for decision-making under ss 20 and 31 of the ICAC Act – whether matters proposed to be investigated must be serious and/or systemic corrupt conduct – relevant and irrelevant considerations – whether consideration of degree of seriousness of impugned conduct is mandatory – whether consideration of potential impact of decision upon pending civil proceedings is mandatory – whether decisions unreasonable – summons dismissed Legislation Cited: Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Independent Commission Against Corruption 1988 (NSW) Cases Cited: Daniels Corporation International Pty Limited v ACCC (2002) 213 CLR 543 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Potter v Minehan (1908) 7 CLR 277 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Knightsbridge North Pty Limited (plaintiff) Independent Commission Against Corruption (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms Bridie Nolan (plaintiff) Mr Scott Robertson (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate