NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chen v NSW Crime Commission [2018] NSWCA 63 Hearing dates: 26 March 2018 Date of orders: 26 March 2018 Decision date: 29 March 2018 Before: Meagher JA Simpson JA Decision: 1. Leave to appeal dismissed. 2. Applicant pay the respondent's costs of the summons. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to appeal – where restraining orders made under Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 – where proposed grounds of appeal challenge making or continuance of two orders under s 10A – where no utility in appeal unless leave granted to challenge both orders – leave refused Legislation Cited: Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: NSW Crime Commission v Chen (Supreme Court (NSW), Button J, unreported) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yan Ping Chen (Applicant) NSW Crime Commission (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
B Walker SC and L Fernandez (Applicant) I Temby QC and R Bhalla (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Nyman Gibson Miralis (Applicant) NSW Crime Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2017/235289 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Common Law Citation: [2017] NSWSC 943 Date of Decision: 17 July 2017 Before: Schmidt J File Number(s): 2014/67125
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate