NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Jefferis v Gells Pty Ltd [2018] NSWDC 73 Hearing dates: 23 March 2018 Date of orders: 29 March 2018 Decision date: 29 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Summary judgment for the plaintiff for $2,540 in relation to paragraphs 3-15 of the Further Amended Statement of Claim filed on 1 July 2017. (2) Plaintiff's Notice of Motion filed on 22 December 2017 otherwise dismissed. (3) Order the plaintiff to pay 80% of the defendant's costs of the Motion, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – costs assessment – whether the quantum of fees sought was fair and reasonable – whether costs assessor had jurisdiction to determine precise terms of retainer – whether that issue was determined by costs assessor, or was a matter to be determined upon a hearing in the District Court
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – whether there was no real question to be tried Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, 13.1 Legal Profession Act 2004, s 268(5) Cases Cited: Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Limited (1983) 154 CLR 87 Calandra v Murden [2015] NSWCA 231 WKA Legal Pty Ltd v Gleeson [2018] NSWSC 318 Branson v Tucker [2012] NSWCA 310 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Richard Jefferis (plaintiff) Gells Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Doyle Gray (plaintiff) M Castle (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate