NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nova 96.9 Pty Limited & Ors v Natvia Pty Limited [2018] NSWDC 74 Hearing dates: 23 March 2018 Date of orders: 29 March 2018 Decision date: 29 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Russell SC DCJ Decision: (1) Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion filed on 7 December 2017 is dismissed. (2) Order that the costs of the Notice of Motion are to be costs in the cause. Catchwords: COSTS – security for costs – application for security for costs pursuant to s 1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) or r 42.21 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – whether there is reason to believe the corporation will be unable to pay costs if ordered to do so
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out part of defendant's cross-claim – collateral contract – whether oral representation made in course of contractual negotiations led to a collateral contract or a term of the primary contract – conflict between pleading in Amended Defence and Cross-Claim Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, 42.21; 14.28 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1335 Cases Cited: Hoyt's Pty Limited v Spencer 27 CLR 133 Crown Melbourne Ltd v Cosmopolitan Hotel (Vic) Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 26 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Nova 96.9 Pty Ltd (first plaintiff) Nova 106.9 Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) Nova 100 Pty Ltd (third plaintiff) Natvia Pty Ltd (defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Doyle Gray (plaintiffs) N Olson (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate