NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v R [2018] NSWCCA 57 Hearing dates: 24 July 2017 Decision date: 06 April 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [12]; Hoeben CJ at CL at [92]; McCallum J at [93]; Bellew J at [105] Decision: (1) Grant the appellant leave to appeal against sentence.
(2) Appeal allowed.
(3) Quash the sentence imposed on the appellant on 9 December 2015 and in lieu thereof, sentence the appellant to a term of imprisonment of 6 years, 3 months commencing on 9 December 2015 to expire on 8 March 2022.
(4) In accordance with the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 19AB(1), fix a non-parole period of 4 years, 8 months to expire on 8 August 2020. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentencing – whether error in consideration of offences pursuant to Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 16BA – whether error in declining to allow discount for utilitarian value of guilty plea for federal offence – whether sentence imposed was manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth), ss 137, 140 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), s 64A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 22 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 16BA, 19AB Criminal Code (Cth), s 400.3 Cases Cited: Ansari v R (2007) 70 NSWLR 89; [2007] NSWCCA 204 Cheng v R (2017) 94 NSWLR 72; [2017] NSWCCA 63 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 Director of Public Prosecutions v Lai [2013] VCC 1318 Hart v Attorney-General for New South Wales [2016] NSWCCA 71 Hili v R; Jones v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Islam v R [2016] NSWCCA 233 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd; Attorney-General for New South Wales v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCCA 96 Nguyen v R (2016) 256 CLR 656; [2016] HCA 17 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 R v Huang; R v Siu (2007) 174 A Crim R 370; [2007] NSWCCA 259 R v Qutami (2001) 127 A Crim R 369; [2001] NSWCCA 353 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Re Attorney-General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1990 No 1 of 2002 (2002) 56 NSWLR 146; [2002] NSWCCA 518 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4 Zhao v R [2016] NSWCCA 179 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jun Yu Huang (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC; S Howell (Appellant) S McNaughton SC; L Crowley (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate