NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Book v R [2018] NSWCCA 58 Hearing dates: 21 March 2018 Date of orders: 11 April 2018 Decision date: 11 April 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ [1] Johnson J at [2] Price J at [69] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – offence of aggravated (in company) break, enter and commit serious indictable offence (stealing) contrary to s.112(2) Crimes Act 1900 – custodial sentence imposed – whether sentence manifestly excessive – assessment of objective seriousness of offence – relevance of offence being committed in company and stealing being the serious indictable offence – prior criminal history included commission of s.112(2) offence – sentence not manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111; [1999] HCA 46 Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Marshall v R [2007] NSWCCA 24 Obeid v R (2017) 350 ALR 103; [2017] NSWCCA 221 R v Huynh [2005] NSWCCA 220 R v Ponfield (1999) 48 NSWLR 327; [1999] NSWCCA 435 White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: John David Book (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr CJ Bruce SC (Applicant) Ms T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate