Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Levick [2018] NSWCATOD 48
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Levick [2018] NSWCATOD 48
Hearing dates: 27 March 2018
Date of orders: 06 April 2018
Decision date: 06 April 2018
Jurisdiction: Occupational Division
Before: L P Robberds QC, Senior Member
P Durack SC, Senior Member
B Thomson, General Member
Decision: The Tribunal makes the following finding and orders:
1. The Tribunal finds that the respondent engaged in professional misconduct by her conduct set out in pars 11 – 13 of the instrument of consent filed on 3 April 2018.
2. Pursuant to ss 302 (1) and 302 (5) of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW), the Tribunal orders that the respondent be publicly reprimanded.
3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings, including costs of the hearing before the Tribunal, agreed in the sum of $22,000 inclusive of all costs, disbursements and counsel's fees.
4. The Tribunal's reasons for that finding and those orders will be published at a later date.
Catchwords: Nil
Legislation Cited: Nil
Cases Cited: Nil
Texts Cited: Nil
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Council of the New South Wales Bar Association (Applicant)
Julieanne Levick (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel: A Douglas-Baker (Applicant)
P Boulten SC (Respondent)
Solicitors: Kennedys (Applicant)
Norton Rose Fulbright (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/285272
Publication restriction: Nil
reasons for decision
1. The Tribunal's reasons for that finding and those orders will be published at a later date.
**********
I hereby certify that this is a true and accurate record of the reasons for decision of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.
Registrar
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 06 April 2018
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.