NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Strathfield Municipal Council v Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] NSWLEC 46 Hearing dates: 23 February 2018, 9 March 2018, 21 March 2018 (written submissions only) Date of orders: 10 April 2018 Decision date: 10 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Robson J Decision: See orders at [21] Catchwords: COSTS – applicant seeks costs of the proceedings – where interlocutory injunction granted and proceedings have subsequently been rendered otiose by grant of development consent – applicable legal principles Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s 76A Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42 Cases Cited: Michael Raad Architects Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1019 Patakas v Bevan (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 303 Strathfield Municipal Council v Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (No 1) [2017] NSWLEC 105 Strathfield Municipal Council v Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 119 Category: Costs Parties: Strathfield Municipal Council (Applicant) Michael Raad Architect Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Hallmark Construction Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Telmet Ventures Pty Ltd (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C J Leggat SC (Applicant) R P L Lancaster SC (First, Second and Third Respondents)
Solicitors: Maddocks Lawyers (Applicant) Milad S Raad & Associates (First, Second and Third Respondents) File Number(s): 2017/00248463
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate