NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Thurston [2018] NSWSC 421 Hearing dates: 19 March 2018 Date of orders: 20 April 2018 Decision date: 20 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Application dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW – application pursuant to the Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – final hearing –defendant previously convicted of murder – extended supervision order sought – whether Court satisfied to a high degree of probability that defendant poses an unacceptable risk of committing a serious violence offence if not kept under supervision – psychiatric evidence – issues of the appropriate duration of any extended supervision order and nature of conditions to be imposed – threshold issue of unacceptable risk not established – application dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Amendment Act 2017 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Amendment Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for NSW v Gallagher [2006] NSWSC 340 Attorney-General for NSW v Quinn [2007] NSWSC 873 Attorney-General for NSW v Winters [2007] NSWSC 611 Cornwall v Attorney-General for NSW [2007] NSW CA 374 Kamm v State of New South Wales (No 4) [2017] NSWCA 189; (2017) 345 ALR 669 Lynn v State NSW [2016] NSWCA 57 Mitchell v The Queen [1996] HCA 45; (1996) 184 CLR 333 R v Lamb & Thurston [2002] NSWSC 1025 R v Thurston [2004] NSWCCA 98 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWSC 1254 State of New South Wales v Sines (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 985 State of New South Wales v Turk [2017] NSWSC 705 State of NSW v Lynn [2013] NSWSC 1147 State of NSW v Pacey [2015] NSWSC 1983 State of NSW v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 State of NSW v Thurston [2017] NSWSC 1760 Tillman v Attorney General for the State of New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 327; (2007) 70 NSWLR 448 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Second Reading Speech, 11 October 2017 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Edward George Thurston (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D New (Plaintiff) A Cook (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate