NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lukac v The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [2018] NSWSC 436 Hearing dates: 12 March 2018 Date of orders: 12 April 2018 Decision date: 12 April 2018 Before: Davies J Decision: Parties to provide Short Minutes of Order to reflect reasons for judgment Catchwords: ASSOCIATIONS AND CLUBS – expulsion, suspension and disqualification – exercise of power – decision by defendant specialist medical college to expel plaintiff from fellowship training program for non-compliance with its regulations – whether the plaintiff was denied procedural fairness - defendant failed to respond to plaintiff's clearly articulated argument – inadequacy of reasons – difficulty in perceiving the reasons for the conclusion of the committee
EQUITY – equitable remedies – injunctions – mandatory - jurisdiction of court to grant relief from decision of private association – where regulations of defendant give rise to contractual obligation to accord procedural fairness to plaintiff – remedies for wrongful exercise of power – whether decision amenable to private law remedies of declaration and injunction so that defendant must reconsider decision in accordance with law Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Agricultural Societies Council of NSW v Christie [2016] NSWCA 331; (2016) 340 ALR 560 Australian Football League v Carlton Football Club Limited [1998] 2 VR 546 Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 393; [2010] NSWCA 190 McClelland v Burning Palms Surf Life Saving Club [2002] NSWSC 470; (2002)191 ALR 759 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611; [2010] HCA 16 Mitchell v Royal New South Wales Canine Council Limited (2001) 52 NSWLR 242; [2001] NSWCA 162 Muralidharan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 62 FCR 402; (1996) 136 ALR 84 Politis v FCT (1988) 16 ALD 707 Re Henry; JL v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2015] NSWCA 89 Scandrett v Dowling (1992) 27 NSWLR 483 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Yvette Lukac (Plaintiff) The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Kelly SC & D P O'Connor (Plaintiff) R Mansted (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate