NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Worldwide Speciality Property Services Ltd (in liq) [2017] NSWSC 1851 Hearing dates: 3 November 2017 Date of orders: 03 November 2017 Decision date: 03 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Brereton J Decision: Plaintiff have leave to commence and continue proceedings against second defendant Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – whether leave should be granted under (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 500 to commence and continue proceedings against company – whether leave is required to sue liquidator personally – whether if leave were required it would be granted – held, all questions answered in the affirmative. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 500 Cases Cited: Aston v Heron (1834) 2 My & K 390; 39 ER 993 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Eighty Second Agenda v Handberg [2014] VSC 655 Maidstone Palace of Varieties, In re [1909] 2 Ch 283 McDonald v Dare [2001] QSC 405 Siromath Pty Ltd (No 3), Re (1991) 25 NSWLR 25 Sullivan v Energy Services International Pty Ltd (in liq) [2002] NSWSC 937; 43 ACSR 179 Wambo Coal Pty Ltd v Ariff [2007] NSWSC 589 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Kia Silverbrook (plaintiff) Gregory J Parker (in his personal capacity and as liquidator of Worldwide Speciality Property Services Pty Ltd (first defendant) Worldwide Speciality Property Services Pty Ltd (in liq) (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Golledge with S Lipp (plaintiff) S Wells (defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate