NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70 Hearing dates: 24 July 2017 Date of orders: 20 April 2018 Decision date: 20 April 2018 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1] Beazley P at [10] Hoeben CJ at CL at [23] McCallum J at [26] Bellew J at [27] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against sentence granted.
(2) Appeal allowed.
(3) Sentences imposed in the District Court of NSW on 29 March 2016 quashed.
(4) In lieu thereof:
(i) In respect of the offence contrary to the Criminal Code (Cth), s 400.9(1), the applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years, 3 months commencing on 18 December 2013 and expiring on 17 March 2016.
(ii) In respect of the offence contrary to the Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 307.1(1), the applicant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 13 years commencing on 17 June 2014 and expiring on 16 June 2027.
(iii) The total term of imprisonment is 13 years, 6 months commencing on 18 December 2013 and expiring on 17 June 2027.
(iv) Specify a single non-parole period of 9 years, 5 months commencing on 18 December 2013 and expiring on 17 May 2023. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Federal offences – Failure to have regard to utilitarian value of plea of guilty in assessing discount – Error established – Applicant resentenced
CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Appeal – Federal offences – Discount for plea of guilty – Necessity to specify the discount which is given in terms which ensure transparency in the sentencing process and precision in the sentence imposed – Observations as to the practice of expressing discount by reference to a range Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Cases Cited: Ayache v R [2013] NSWCCA 41 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas (2016) 347 ALR 275; [2016] VSCA 237 Ghobrial v R [2012] NSWCCA 221 Hall v R [2017] NSWCCA 260 Hili v R (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v R (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 Kentwell v R (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Burton [2008] NSWCCA 128 R v Knight; R v Biuvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; (2007) 176 A Crim R 338 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 Xiao v R [2018] NSWCCA 4 Yuksel v R [2010] NSWCCA 65 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: H Dhanji SC and R Burgess (Applicant) S McNaughton SC, T Prince and R Ranken (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate