Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Scholefield Goodman (Australia) Pty Limited v Rutkowski (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 453 Hearing dates: 31 January 2018 Date of orders: 13 April 2018 Decision date: 13 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) The defendant, Sigmund Rutkowski, is convicted of contempt of Court; (2) The Court imposes a sentence of Community Service of 96 hours under the standard conditions; (3) The defendant to report to the Assigned Officer for community serviced at Sutherland Community Corrections Office within seven (7) days hereof; (4) The defendant shall report to the Registry of the Court forthwith to obtain a copy of the order. Catchwords: CONTEMPT – sentence – Pre-Sentence Report provided – Community Service Order imposed Category: Sentence Parties: Scholefield Goodman (Australia) Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Sigmund Rutkowski (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Newton/A Carr (Plaintiff) P Bolster (Defendant) Solicitors: Gadens Lawyers (Plaintiff) Marando Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): 2015/303588 Judgment 1. HIS HONOUR: For the reasons published on 31 January 2018, and having received a positive Pre-Sentence Report from Corrective Services and otherwise being satisfied of the matters referred to in s 86 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, the Court makes the following orders and makes the following sentence: 1. The defendant, Sigmund Rutkowski, is convicted of contempt of Court; 2. The Court imposes a sentence of Community Service of 96 hours under the standard conditions; 3. The defendant to report to the Assigned Officer for community service at Sutherland Community Corrections Office within seven (7) days hereof; 4. The defendant shall report to the Registry of the Court forthwith to obtain a copy of the Community Service Order. ********** DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 13 April 2018