NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Udy v Tilley [2018] NSWCATAP 89 Hearing dates: 15 March 2018 Date of orders: 26 April 2018 Decision date: 26 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Principal Member J McAteer, Senior Member Decision: (1) The application for leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL TENACNT AGREEMENT- claim for refund of water usage charges-breach of agreement-time limit to bring application-date tenant became aware of breach Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules, 2014 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Act, 2010 (NSW) Residential Tenancies Regulation, 2010 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Udy (Appellant) Monique Tilley (Respondent) Representation: In person (Appellant) By phone and P Tilley in person(Respondent) File Number(s): AP 17/52295 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 24 November 2017 Before: S de Jersey, General Member File Number(s): RT 17/31878
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate