NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Spring v North Sydney Council [2018] NSWSC 463 Hearing dates: 26 March; 4, 6 April 2018 Date of orders: 06 April 2018 Decision date: 06 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Parker J Decision: Plaintiff's application for adjournment refused. Order made for separate and later determination of quantum of any compensation required for grant of compulsory easement sought by plaintiff. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for adjournment – where adjournment is sought so that a development application can be assessed by a new independent planning panel – whether the planning panel obviates the need for a s 88K application – the new planning system is "not an appropriate reason" to adjourn the plaintiff's s 88K application – the absence of prejudice to the defendant is not enough to allow the plaintiff's application to proceed
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 9.1 – Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cl 49 – direction by Minister for Planning – Local Planning Panels Direction - Development Applications, Sch 1, cl 1 – discussion of whether development application is within the scope of cl 1 – discussion of whether Council is a "landowner" whose written consent is required for the plaintiff to lodge the development application
EASEMENTS – Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88K – discussion of grant of rights in an easement – discussion of whether a servient owner can owe a duty to the dominant owner to consent to the lodgement of a development application Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88K Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 9.1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW), cl 49 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Kladis v Lowe [2016] NSWSC 1834 Owners Corporation – Strata Plan No. 8450 v Owners Corporation – Strata Plan No. 54547 [2002] NSWSC 780 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Caroline Spring (Plaintiff) North Sydney Council (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: RM Higgins (Plaintiff) M Condon SC/R Mansted (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate