NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Safe Work (NSW v Activate Fire PL; Safe Work (NSW) v Unity (NSW) P/L [2016] NSWDC 440 Hearing dates: 29 November 2016 Date of orders: 30 November 2016 Decision date: 30 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: 1. I extend time to serve the proof of evidence of Peter Wells by the prosecutor to 29 November 2016. 2. I direct that Mr Wells not be called until the trial resumes at a date to be fixed at the end of the time allocated. 3. I reserve any question of costs relating to this issue to the end of the trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – workplace injury – injury to employee EVIDENCE – admissibility of evidence – evidence sought to be relied on after service of prosecution brief of evidence – prejudice to defendants Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s.188 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 s.32 Cases Cited: DPP v Lazzam [2016] NSWSC 145 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Safe Work (NSW) (Prosecutor) Acitvate Fire P/L (First Defendant) Unity (NSW) P/L (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Moir (Prosecutor) Mr C O'Neil (First Defendant) Mr C Magee (Second Defendant)
Solicitors: Safe Work (NSW) (Prosecutor) SBC legal Services (First Defendant) Dettman Longworth Lawyers (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/0007706 (First Defendant) 2016/00077902 (Second Defendant) Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate