NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Sanpoint Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 480 Hearing dates: 29 September 2017 Date of orders: 19 April 2018 Decision date: 19 April 2018 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Robb J Decision: The second defendant/cross claimant to pay the plaintiff's costs in the proceedings, save for the costs of the separate questions determined by Pembroke J in V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Lucas Dumbrell Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1391, assessed on the ordinary basis for costs incurred up to and including 25 May 2015 and on an indemnity basis for costs incurred from 26 May 2015. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party —Offers of compromise/Calderbank offers — whether Calderbank offer was effective — whether indemnity costs should be ordered against offeree following non acceptance of Calderbank offer — whether offer of compromise was a real and genuine offer
COSTS — Party/Party — Bases of quantification — Ordinary basis
COSTS — Party/Party — Bases of quantification — Indemnity basis Cases Cited: Regency Media Pty Ltd v AAV Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 368 Leach v The Nominal Defendant (QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd) (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 391 V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Sanpoint Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1043 V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Lucas Dumbrell Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1391 Prospect Resources Ltd v Molyneux [2015] NSWCA 171 Hobartville Stud Pty Ltd v Union Insurance Co Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 358 Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pte Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 Vale v Eggins (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 12 Category: Costs Parties: V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd (first plaintiff/first cross defendant) Australian Motor Racing Partners Pty Ltd (second plaintiff/second cross defendant) Sanpoint Pty Ltd in any capacity (including as trustee for the Fiore Family Trust and as trustee for the partners of Sanpoint) (second defendant/cross claimant) Representation: Counsel: PS Braham SC/T O'Brien (plaintiffs/cross defendants) CRC Newlinds SC/BK Koch (second defendant/cross claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate